Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juicy Pink Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:23, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Juicy Pink Box

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to lack notability. Madness ^Darkness 15:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 16:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 19:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as does not pass WP:CORPDEPTH with a lack of independent significant coverage in reliable sources, for example the xbiz piece is a very promotional piece indeed with no independent analysis, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as cannot find any no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 19:53, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 20:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.